Comments on: ValourIT and Army Strong http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/ This We'll Defend Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:36:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3 By: MissBirdlegs in AL http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-502116 MissBirdlegs in AL Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:08:00 +0000 http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-502116 Sorry, Dear. Have to support another branch until they win, then we can talk Army Strong. ;) I'm with gypsy on the hopes and the prayers. Y'all take good care. Sorry, Dear. Have to support another branch until they win, then we can talk Army Strong. ;)

I’m with gypsy on the hopes and the prayers. Y’all take good care.

]]> By: gypsy http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-501077 gypsy Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:45:55 +0000 http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-501077 This is such a great way to show support...consider the word passed as well. Hope things are ok with you Hook, stay safe...you all are in my prayers. This is such a great way to show support…consider the word passed as well.

Hope things are ok with you Hook, stay safe…you all are in my prayers.

]]> By: Jacki http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-498914 Jacki Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:59:56 +0000 http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-498914 Sorry, broke the link. New widget is here: http://soldiersangels.org/therm.html Sorry, broke the link. New widget is here: http://soldiersangels.org/therm.html

]]> By: Jacki http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-498911 Jacki Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:58:23 +0000 http://sgthook.com/2007/10/30/valourit-and-army-strong/#comment-498911 There's a new widget for tracking donations for Project Valour IT available <a>here</a>. Donations made through the old widget are still valid, but have to be tallied by hand. There’s a new widget for tracking donations for Project Valour IT available here. Donations made through the old widget are still valid, but have to be tallied by hand.

]]>